Dr. Akos Zahar, Director of the International Fellowship Programme at The HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg on the left of this photo in his office
I would like to take the opportunity first to thank the BOA and the sponsors for funding my travelling fellowship to Germany.
Having undertaken an MD at University College London on management of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after hip and knee replacements, I wanted to visit leading centres in the world to further enhance my knowledge of new strategies to combat PJIs and hence my choice of The HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg. I have indeed spent 2 great weeks with Professor Gehrke’s team where I have learnt alot about PJIs and lower limb arthroplasty primary and revision procedures. At the ENDO-Klinik, there are clear protocols for prevention and treatment of PJIs with regular active research into new strategies to improve PJI management.
Research on PJIs has proven that prevention is the most effective way of managing PJIs and hence the robust mechanisms of prevention being strictly implemented at the ENDO-Klinik starting with the assessment and appropriate selection of the right patient to undergo an operation then optimising the patient and surrounding environment to achieve the best results. An example to the preventative measures strictly adhered to is the uni-directional flow system all theatre staff are required to follow whilst going in and out of theatre with the changing area being divided into a room where staff take off their normal clothes and then enter a special room to wear the scrubs with no return access to the changing room. Once the scrub room is left to enter theatres, again there is no access back to the scrub room. Similarly, if you want to leave theatre you go into a room to remove the scrubs and then access the changing room again with no return allowed to the rooms you leave. This also means that if you were to use the toilets in the changing room, then you will have to go through the whole cycle again leaving and then re-entering theatres!
A great amount of work has been led by Professor Gehrke together with Professor Parvizi from The Rothman institute in Philadelphia and their teams on diagnosing PJIs with the latest being the introduction of synovial fluid biomarkers such as human α-defensin 1-3, neutrophil elastase 2, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and lactoferrin, which correctly predicted the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) classification of all 95 patients included in a recent study, with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PJI. It was a huge privilege for me to observe how those tests are performed under the appropriate indications and utilisation of the tests to appropriately diagnose PJIs.
Managing established infections also follows clearly defined protocols with overall high rates of controlling PJIs. Among the interesting themes I have been exposed to and felt are important in managing PJIs are the implementation of the MSIS definition of PJIs and the multi-disciplinary approach to treating PJIs especially the microbiologist’s input in dictating antibiotic treatment with exact dosing of the cement antibiotic and perioperative antibiotic treatment. Other important measures included patient medical optimisation, pre-operative skin preparation, the operating room environment, antibiotic prophylaxis, diagnosis of PJIs
in inflammatory conditions and culture negative PJIs, management of atypical PJIs and fungal infections, the role of irrigation and debridement and one and two stage exchange arthroplasties. Of particular interest to me was how they implement the single stage revision for almost all comers in treating hip and knee PJIs (>90%) with the only one real contraindication for them being the absence of an organism growth from cultures performed preoperatively when they utilise a two-stage revision procedure instead. So in contrary to evidence from other leading centres, a sinus tract and growth of polymicrobial and multi-resistant organisms are not contraindications to a single-stage revision! I believe their strict approach to treating PJIs has resulted in their high infection control rates of PJIs as recently published in their 10 years follow-up of infected TKRs treated with a single stage revision and achieving an overall 93% infection control rates. Furthermore, I have learnt alot about revision arthroplasty procedures in terms of implants used and indications for various procedures performed.
This fellowship not only improved my knowledge of managing PJIs but also introduced me to the differences between the healthcare systems in Germany and the UK. For example, similar to the healthcare system in the USA, the attending physician is bound to see all patients with the residents in the clinics and is required to be scrubbed in any critical step of an operation even if a senior resident capable of doing the procedure independently is the primary surgeon. Additionally, there is a well-established role for theatre assistants in Germany who contribute significantly to efficient utilisation of theatre time.
Similar to university hospitals in the UK, there are dedicated teams working on research and I had the great pleasure of involving myself with a number of research projects and publications during my visit to the ENDO-Klinik. Last but not least, I have enjoyed the sightseeing in Hamburg having visited most of the tourist attractions of the city.
Overall this has been a unique experience for me and again I would like to thank BOA, the sponsors, Professor Gehrke and his team for giving me the opportunity to visit The HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg.